Limiting Children’s Screen Time Improves Their Memory, Attention and Language Skills

Summary

Background

Childhood and adolescence are crucial periods for brain development, and the behaviours during a typical 24 h period contribute to cognitive performance. The Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth recommend at least 60 min physical activity per day, 2 h or less recreational screen time per day, and 9–11 h sleep per night in children aged 8–11 years. We investigated the relationship between adherence to these recommendations and global cognition.

Methods

In this cross-sectional observational study, we obtained data from the first annual curated release of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, a 10-year longitudinal, observational study. Data were collected from 21 study sites across the USA between Sept 1, 2016, and Sept 15, 2017. The participants were 4524 US children aged 8–11 years from 20 study sites. Exposures of interest were adherence to the physical activity, recreational screen time, and sleep duration guideline recommendations. The primary outcome was global cognition, assessed with the NIH Toolbox (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), which we analysed with multivariable linear mixed-effects models to examine the relations with movement behaviour variables.

Findings

Complete movement behaviour data were available for 4520 participants. The mean number of guideline recommendations met was 1·1 (SD 0·9). Overall, 2303 (51%) participants met the sleep recommendation, 1655 (37%) met screen time, and 793 (18%) met the physical activity recommendation. 3190 (71%) participants met at least one recommendation, whereas 216 (5%) of participants met all three recommendations. Global cognition was positively associated with each additional recommendation met (β=1·44, 95% CI 0·82–2·07, p<0·0001). Compared with meeting none of the recommendations, associations with superior global cognition were found in participants who met all three recommendations (β=3·89, 95% CI 1·43 to 6·34, p=0·0019), the screen time recommendation only (β=4·25, 2·50–6·01, p<0·0001), and both the screen time and the sleep recommendations (β=5·15, 3·56–6·74, p<0·0001).

Interpretation

Meeting the 24 h movement recommendations was associated with superior global cognition. These findings highlight the importance of limiting recreational screen time and encouraging healthy sleep to improve cognition in children.

Read the Research

 

References:

  1. 1.
    • Donnelly JE
    • Hillman CH
    • Castelli D
    • et al.
    Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review.

    Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016; 481197-1222

  2. 2.
    • Álvarez-Bueno C
    • Pesce C
    • Cavero-Redondo I
    • Sánchez-López M
    • Garrido-Miguel M
    • Martínez-Vizcaíno V
    Academic achievement and physical activity: a meta-analysis.

    Pediatrics. 2017; 140e20171498

  3. 3.
    • Hillman CH
    • Pontifex MB
    • Castelli DM
    • et al.
    Effects of the FITKids randomized controlled trial on executive control and brain function.

    Pediatrics. 2014; 134e1063-e1071

  4. 4.
    • Hillman CH
    • Erickson KI
    • Kramer AF
    Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition.

    Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 958-65

  5. 5.
    • Short MA
    • Blunden S
    • Rigney G
    • et al.
    Cognition and objectively measured sleep duration in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Sleep Health. 2018; 4292-300

  6. 6.
    • Faught EL
    • Ekwaru JP
    • Gleddie D
    • Storey KE
    • Asbridge M
    • Veugelers PJ
    The combined impact of diet, physical activity, sleep and screen time on academic achievement: a prospective study of elementary school students in Nova Scotia, Canada.

    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 141-13

  7. 7.
    • López-Vicente M
    • Garcia-Aymerich J
    • Torrent-Pallicer J
    • et al.
    Are early physical activity and sedentary behaviors related to working memory at 7 and 14 years of age?.

    J Pediatr. 2017; 18835-41.e1

  8. 8.
    • Maher C
    • Lewis L
    • Katzmarzyk PT
    • Dumuid D
    • Cassidy L
    • Olds T
    The associations between physical activity, sedentary behaviour and academic performance.

    J Sci Med Sport. 2016; 191004-1009

  9. 9.
    • Uncapher MR
    • Lin L
    • Rosen LD
    • et al.
    Media multitasking and cognitive, psychological, neural, and learning differences.

    Pediatrics. 2017; 140S62-S66

  10. 10.
    • Wilmer HH
    • Sherman LE
    • Chein JM
    Smartphones and cognition: a review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning.

    Front Psychol. 2017; 81-16

  11. 11.
    • Anderson DR
    • Subrahmanyam K
    Digital screen media and cognitive development.

    Pediatrics. 2017; 140S57-S61

  12. 12.
    • Tremblay MS
    • Carson V
    • Chaput JP
    • et al.
    Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep 1.

    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41311-327

  13. 13.
    • Tremblay MS
    • Carson V
    • Chaput J-P
    Introduction to the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep.

    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41iii-iiv

  14. 14.
    • WHO
    Global recommendations on physical activity for health.

    World Health OrganizationGeneva201060

  15. 15.
    • Hirshkowitz M
    • Whiton K
    • Albert SM
    • et al.
    National Sleep Foundation’s updated sleep duration recommendations: final report.

    Sleep Health. 2015; 1233-243

  16. 16.
    • Carson V
    • Chaput JP
    • Janssen I
    • Tremblay MS
    Health associations with meeting new 24-hour movement guidelines for Canadian children and youth.

    Prev Med (Baltim). 2017; 957-13

  17. 17.
    • Martínez-Gómez D
    • Veiga OL
    • Gómez-Martínez S
    • et al.
    Gender-specific influence of health behaviors on academic performance in Spanish adolescents: the AFINOS study.

    Nutr Hosp. 2012; 27724-730

  18. 18.
    • Barch DM
    • Albaugh MD
    • Avenevoli S
    • et al.
    Demographic, physical and mental health assessments in the adolescent brain and cognitive development study: rationale and description.

    Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018; 3255-66

  19. 19.
    • Clark DB
    • Fisher CB
    • Bookheimer S
    • et al.
    Biomedical ethics and clinical oversight in multisite observational neuroimaging studies with children and adolescents: the ABCD experience.

    Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018; 32143-154

  20. 20.
    • Luciana M
    • Bjork JM
    • Nagel BJ
    • et al.
    Adolescent neurocognitive development and impacts of substance use: Overview of the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) baseline neurocognition battery.

    Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018; 3267-79

  21. 21.
    • Akshoomoff N
    • Beaumont JL
    • Bauer PJ
    • et al.
    NIH toolbox cognition battery (CB): composite scores of crystallized, fluid, and overall cognition.

    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2013; 78119-132

  22. 22.
    • Lindenberger U
    Lifespan theories of cognitive development.

    in: Smelser NJ Baltes PB International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. PergamonOxford20018848-8854

  23. 23.
    • Brener ND
    • Kann L
    • McManus T
    • Kinchen SA
    • Sundberg EC
    • Ross JG
    Reliability of the 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey questionnaire.

    J Adolesc Health. 2002; 31336-342

  24. 24.
    • Sharif I
    • Wills TA
    • Sargent JD
    Effect of visual media use on school performance: a prospective study.

    J Adolesc Health. 2010; 4652-61

  25. 25.
    • Bruni O
    • Ottaviano S
    • Guidetti V
    • et al.
    The Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC). Construct ion and validation of an instrument to evaluate sleep disturbances in childhood and adolescence.

    J Sleep Res. 1996; 5251-261

  26. 26.
    • Stover PJ
    • Harlan WR
    • Hammond JA
    • Hendershot T
    • Hamilton CM
    PhenX: a toolkit for interdisciplinary genetics research.

    Curr Opin Lipidol. 2010; 21136-140

  27. 27.
    • Petersen AC
    • Crockett L
    • Richards M
    • Boxer A
    A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms.

    J Youth Adolesc. 1988; 17117-133

  28. 28.
    • De Onis M
    • Onyango AW
    • Borghi E
    • Siyam A
    • Nishida C
    • Siekmann J
    Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents.

    Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85812-819

  29. 29.
    • Corrigan JD
    • Bogner J
    Initial reliability and validity of the Ohio State University TBI identification method.

    J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007; 22318-329

  30. 30.
    • Kohl HW
    • Craig CL
    • Lambert EV
    • et al.
    The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health.

    Lancet. 2012; 380294-305

  31. 31.
    • Iglowstein I
    • Jenni OG
    • Molinari L
    • Largo RH
    Sleep duration from infancy to adolescence: reference values and generational trends.

    Pediatrics. 2003; 111302-307

  32. 32.
    • Cain N
    • Gradisar M
    Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: a review.

    Sleep Med. 2010; 11735-742

  33. 33.
    • Duncan GJ
    • Dowsett CJ
    • Claessens A
    • et al.
    School readiness and later achievement.

    Dev Psychol. 2007; 431428-1446

  34. 34.
    • Calvin CM
    • Deary IJ
    • Fenton C
    • et al.
    Intelligence in youth and all-cause-mortality: systematic review with meta-analysis.

    Int J Epidemiol. 2011; 40626-644

  35. 35.
    • Hales CM
    • Carroll MD
    • Fryar CD
    • Ogden CL
    NCHS data brief: prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016.

    Centres for Disease Control and PreventionAtlanta, GA2017

Click to access the login or register cheese